Carl, this is quite wonderful. I would really really sometime like to have an open-ended (sort of) brain-picking type of conversation with you in which we strategize regarding the best way to deploy ourselves to prevent a mid-term disaster, and that election is only months away. I'm having difficulty prioritizing right from the get go, because there are so many issues that seem important. And then, even if I could get my priorities straight, lol.... there would still be issues as to what are the best way to achieve those priorities in the limited time we have with the limited resources we have. Please call me sometime at 605-262-0109. I don't want to call you out of the blue, and we may want to set it up ahead of time anyway. For example, I am not at my best in early morning, lol. But I sure would like to have a couple of people with whom I could toss things around on a regular basis. I suppose I could even get talked into doing one of those apps where you can see one another, altho to date I have resisted that mightily.
Hi Carl, Longtime friend of Patricia Reed here. Several thoughts emerged as I was reading through this essay, which resonated strongly with me. I've written several articles seeking to expose propaganda for what it is. Not once had I considered treating everything as propaganda, which I find to be uniquely intriguing as a tactic for engaging the mind of the hopelessly inculcated, thought resistant progressive. As I ruminate over this strategy, and as a means to introduce myself, please allow me to offer up my essay on climate change. An essay which, despite the incontrovertible proof, has been challenged by one of these "wokies" citing the usual, "But the consensus of scientists say..." Check it out: https://craigbell.substack.com/p/global-warming-is-a-myth
I read and liked your going to the source aspect of your post. Two things point to the CO2 Global Warming as a hoax to me are: 1) Scientists have experimented with the the percentages of gases replicating our atmosphere and found heat was absorbed to a certain level and then the CO2 would absorb no more. 2) millions of years of core samples showing C02 levels versus Temperature show no correlation.
Carl, this is quite wonderful. I would really really sometime like to have an open-ended (sort of) brain-picking type of conversation with you in which we strategize regarding the best way to deploy ourselves to prevent a mid-term disaster, and that election is only months away. I'm having difficulty prioritizing right from the get go, because there are so many issues that seem important. And then, even if I could get my priorities straight, lol.... there would still be issues as to what are the best way to achieve those priorities in the limited time we have with the limited resources we have. Please call me sometime at 605-262-0109. I don't want to call you out of the blue, and we may want to set it up ahead of time anyway. For example, I am not at my best in early morning, lol. But I sure would like to have a couple of people with whom I could toss things around on a regular basis. I suppose I could even get talked into doing one of those apps where you can see one another, altho to date I have resisted that mightily.
Thank you Patricia. I'll call you for a chat some afternoon. :)
Hi Carl, Longtime friend of Patricia Reed here. Several thoughts emerged as I was reading through this essay, which resonated strongly with me. I've written several articles seeking to expose propaganda for what it is. Not once had I considered treating everything as propaganda, which I find to be uniquely intriguing as a tactic for engaging the mind of the hopelessly inculcated, thought resistant progressive. As I ruminate over this strategy, and as a means to introduce myself, please allow me to offer up my essay on climate change. An essay which, despite the incontrovertible proof, has been challenged by one of these "wokies" citing the usual, "But the consensus of scientists say..." Check it out: https://craigbell.substack.com/p/global-warming-is-a-myth
I read and liked your going to the source aspect of your post. Two things point to the CO2 Global Warming as a hoax to me are: 1) Scientists have experimented with the the percentages of gases replicating our atmosphere and found heat was absorbed to a certain level and then the CO2 would absorb no more. 2) millions of years of core samples showing C02 levels versus Temperature show no correlation.
Agree.